PairBook
HomePAXS › PAXS vs PFN

PAXS vs PFN: Correlation

How closely do PIMCO Access Income Fund (PAXS) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.74, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.74
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.73
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.58
long-run
Ann. covariance
131.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PAXS and PFN?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PAXS and PFN correlate at 0.74, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.73 over 1 year against 0.74 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.58, with an annualized covariance of 131.3 %².

In PAXS's tracked universe of 10 assets, PFN sits right near the top at #2. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -0.3% against +4.1%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PAXS vs PFN: side by side

PAXS (PIMCO Access Income Fund)PFN (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II)
1-year return-0.3%+4.1%
5-year return+20.5%+9.3%
Volatility (ann.)14.6%12.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.480.40
Max drawdown (3Y)-13.4%-11.1%
Market cap$0.7B$0.7B
P/E (trailing)7.713.4
Dividend yield0.00%12.40%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: PAXS 7.7 vs 13.4Higher yield: PFN 12.40% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PFN -11.1% vs -13.4%Higher 5y return: PAXS +20.5% vs +9.3%
-9%0%+4%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). PAXS · PFN

Year-by-year returns

YearPAXSPFN
2022-17.6%
2023+9.3%+15.5%
2024+19.5%+15.8%
2025+12.5%+13.1%
2026+0.2%+1.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PAXS and PFN good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.74 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PAXS and PFN?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.74 over 3 years, with 0.73 over the last year and 0.58 over 5 years.

Is PFN a good diversifier for PAXS?

To a limited degree. At 0.74 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.74 mean?

A reading of 0.74 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/paxs-vs-pfn.json

PAXS vs PFN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.74PAXS vs PFN0.74

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PAXS vs PFN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/paxs-vs-pfn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/paxs-vs-pfn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PAXS correlations · PFN correlations