PairBook
HomePETS › PETS vs VXZ

PETS vs VXZ: Correlation

PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-480.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PETS and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, PETS and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.34) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.27, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -480.5 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against PETS, VXZ lands near the bottom at #8. The last year tells two different stories: VXZ led by 25.4 percentage points, -41.5% for PETS against -16.1% for VXZ. Risk is not evenly split, since PETS carries 2.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PETS vs VXZ: side by side

PETS (PetMed Express, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-41.5%-16.1%
5-year return-92.7%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)72.9%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.10-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.3%-36.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -86.3%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -92.7%
-47%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. PETS · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearPETSVXZ
2022-25.8%+0.5%
2023-54.8%-44.0%
2024-36.2%-12.7%
2025-33.6%+5.7%
2026-42.2%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PETS and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PETS and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PETS and VXZ is -0.26 over 3 years, -0.34 over 1 year and -0.27 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for PETS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pets-vs-vxz.json

PETS vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26PETS vs VXZ-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![PETS vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pets-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pets-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PETS correlations · VXZ correlations