PairBook
HomeATPC › ATPC vs PETS

ATPC vs PETS: Correlation

How closely do Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC) and PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.27, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2954.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ATPC and PETS?

On 3 years of weekly data the ATPC/PETS correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.38) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.27). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -2954.8 %².

Out of 17 assets tracked against ATPC, PETS lands near the bottom at #14. The last year tells two different stories: PETS led by 55.1 percentage points, -96.6% for ATPC against -41.5% for PETS. Note the risk asymmetry: ATPC runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ATPC vs PETS: side by side

ATPC (Agape ATP Corporation)PETS (PetMed Express, Inc.)
1-year return-96.6%-41.5%
5-year returnn/a-92.7%
Volatility (ann.)151.3%72.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.041.10
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-86.3%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: PETS -86.3% vs -100.0%
-97%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ATPC · PETS

Year-by-year returns

YearATPCPETS
2022-25.8%
2023-54.8%
2024-90.8%-36.2%
2025-90.9%-33.6%
2026-55.7%-42.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ATPC and PETS good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ATPC and PETS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.27 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is PETS a good diversifier for ATPC?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/atpc-vs-pets.json

ATPC vs PETS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27ATPC vs PETS-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ATPC vs PETS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/atpc-vs-pets.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/atpc-vs-pets/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ATPC correlations · PETS correlations