PairBook
HomePBA › PBA vs PPTA

PBA vs PPTA: Correlation

Pembina Pipeline Corp. (PBA) and Perpetua Resources Corp. (PPTA) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-320.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PBA and PPTA?

Over the past 3 years, PBA and PPTA moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.43) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.21). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.08, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -320.0 %².

PPTA is close to the least connected end of PBA's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 13. The trailing year gives PPTA the advantage: +31.4% versus +40.7%, a 9.3-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: PPTA runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PBA vs PPTA: side by side

PBA (Pembina Pipeline Corp.)PPTA (Perpetua Resources Corp.)
1-year return+31.4%+40.7%
5-year return+98.2%+427.8%
Volatility (ann.)20.0%77.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.080.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.9%-54.6%
Market cap$28.1B$3.3B
P/E (trailing)23.7
Dividend yield5.93%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PBA 5.93% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PBA -17.9% vs -54.6%Higher 5y return: PPTA +427.8% vs +98.2%
-8%0%+100%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PBA · PPTA

Year-by-year returns

YearPBAPPTA
2022+18.3%-38.5%
2023+7.8%+8.6%
2024+13.2%+236.6%
2025+5.7%+126.9%
2026+30.0%+8.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PBA and PPTA good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PBA and PPTA?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and 0.08 over 5 years.

Is PPTA a good diversifier for PBA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pba-vs-ppta.json

PBA vs PPTA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21PBA vs PPTA-0.21

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![PBA vs PPTA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pba-vs-ppta.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pba-vs-ppta/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PBA correlations · PPTA correlations