PairBook
HomePBA › PBA vs TMQ

PBA vs TMQ: Correlation

Pembina Pipeline Corp. (PBA) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-666.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PBA and TMQ?

Over the past 3 years, PBA and TMQ moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.42 versus -0.25 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -666.7 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against PBA, TMQ lands near the bottom at #12. The last year tells two different stories: TMQ led by 94.9 percentage points, +31.4% for PBA against +126.3% for TMQ. Note the risk asymmetry: TMQ runs 6.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PBA vs TMQ: side by side

PBA (Pembina Pipeline Corp.)TMQ (Trilogy Metals Inc.)
1-year return+31.4%+126.3%
5-year return+98.2%+85.3%
Volatility (ann.)20.0%131.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.080.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.9%-72.5%
Market cap$28.1B$0.7B
P/E (trailing)23.7
Dividend yield5.93%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PBA 5.93% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PBA -17.9% vs -72.5%Higher 5y return: PBA +98.2% vs +85.3%
-3%0%+251%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PBA · TMQ

Year-by-year returns

YearPBATMQ
2022+18.3%-66.7%
2023+7.8%-21.8%
2024+13.2%+169.8%
2025+5.7%+271.6%
2026+30.0%-12.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PBA and TMQ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PBA and TMQ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PBA and TMQ is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.42 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is TMQ a good diversifier for PBA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pba-vs-tmq.json

PBA vs TMQ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25PBA vs TMQ-0.25

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![PBA vs TMQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pba-vs-tmq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pba-vs-tmq/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PBA correlations · TMQ correlations