PairBook
HomePACS › PACS vs UTI

PACS vs UTI: Correlation

PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) and Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.27.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1853.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PACS and UTI?

On 3 years of weekly data the PACS/UTI correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.31) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1853.1 %².

Within PACS's tracked universe of 35 assets, UTI comes in at #27 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PACS outperformed by 293.2 percentage points (+273.0% for PACS against -20.2% for UTI). Note the risk asymmetry: PACS runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PACS vs UTI: side by side

PACS (PACS Group, Inc.)UTI (Universal Technical Institute Inc)
1-year return+273.0%-20.2%
5-year returnn/a+211.1%
Volatility (ann.)120.5%54.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.060.64
Max drawdown (3Y)-82.0%-57.8%
Market cap$7.0B$1.2B
P/E (trailing)25.936.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: PACS 25.9 vs 36.0Smaller drawdown: UTI -57.8% vs -82.0%
-20%0%+334%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PACS · UTI

Year-by-year returns

YearPACSUTI
2022-14.1%
2023+86.3%
2024+105.4%
2025+192.8%+1.6%
2026+15.2%-17.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PACS and UTI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PACS and UTI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.27 over 3 years, with -0.31 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is UTI a good diversifier for PACS?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pacs-vs-uti.json

PACS vs UTI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27PACS vs UTI-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![PACS vs UTI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pacs-vs-uti.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pacs-vs-uti/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PACS correlations · UTI correlations