PairBook
HomePACS › PACS vs TPL

PACS vs TPL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) carry a correlation of -0.18, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1203.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PACS and TPL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PACS and TPL correlate at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.30 versus -0.18 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1203.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, TPL places #15 of the 35 assets tracked against PACS. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PACS outperformed by 250.2 percentage points (+273.0% for PACS against +22.8% for TPL). Note the risk asymmetry: PACS runs 2.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PACS vs TPL: side by side

PACS (PACS Group, Inc.)TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation)
1-year return+273.0%+22.8%
5-year returnn/a+149.6%
Volatility (ann.)120.5%50.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.060.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-82.0%-52.2%
Market cap$7.0B$25.5B
P/E (trailing)25.947.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.61%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Lower P/E: PACS 25.9 vs 47.2Higher yield: TPL 0.61% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TPL -52.2% vs -82.0%
-13%0%+334%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). PACS · TPL

Year-by-year returns

YearPACSTPL
2022+91.3%
2023-32.4%
2024+115.3%
2025+192.8%-21.6%
2026+15.2%+29.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PACS and TPL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PACS and TPL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between PACS and TPL is -0.18 over 3 years, -0.30 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is TPL a good diversifier for PACS?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pacs-vs-tpl.json

PACS vs TPL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18PACS vs TPL-0.18

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PACS vs TPL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pacs-vs-tpl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pacs-vs-tpl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PACS correlations · TPL correlations