PairBook
HomeNCLH › NCLH vs VIK

NCLH vs VIK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) carry a correlation of 0.68, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.68
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
1091.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NCLH and VIK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of NCLH and VIK correlate at 0.68, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.68 over 1 year against 0.68 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of 1091.3 %².

Few assets follow NCLH as closely as VIK, which ranks #3 of 35 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: VIK led by 75.8 percentage points, -33.1% for NCLH against +42.7% for VIK.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NCLH vs VIK: side by side

NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings)VIK (Viking Holdings Ltd)
1-year return-33.1%+42.7%
5-year return-34.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)49.9%33.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.521.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-49.1%-35.4%
Market cap$7.6B$40.1B
P/E (trailing)10.130.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Lower P/E: NCLH 10.1 vs 30.0Smaller drawdown: VIK -35.4% vs -49.1%
-40%0%+68%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. NCLH · VIK

Year-by-year returns

YearNCLHVIK
2022-41.0%
2023+63.7%
2024+28.4%
2025-13.3%+62.1%
2026-25.4%+25.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NCLH and VIK good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.68 means NCLH and VIK share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NCLH and VIK?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.68 over 3 years, with 0.68 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is VIK a good diversifier for NCLH?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.68 means NCLH and VIK share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.68 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/nclh-vs-vik.json

NCLH vs VIK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.68NCLH vs VIK0.68

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![NCLH vs VIK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/nclh-vs-vik.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/nclh-vs-vik/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NCLH correlations · VIK correlations