PairBook
HomeNCLH › NCLH vs RF

NCLH vs RF: Correlation

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.59.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.59
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.53
long-run
Ann. covariance
864.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are NCLH and RF?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of NCLH and RF correlate at 0.59, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.49 over 1 year against 0.59 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.53, with an annualized covariance of 864.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, RF places #6 of the 35 assets tracked against NCLH. The last year tells two different stories: RF led by 48.5 percentage points, -33.1% for NCLH against +15.4% for RF. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.40 and 0.74, a moderate band. One caveat on sizing: NCLH is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

NCLH vs RF: side by side

NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings)RF (Regions Financial Corporation)
1-year return-33.1%+15.4%
5-year return-34.4%+83.5%
Volatility (ann.)49.9%29.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.521.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-49.1%-31.9%
Market cap$7.6B$25.9B
P/E (trailing)10.112.4
Dividend yield0.00%3.45%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryFinancials
Lower P/E: NCLH 10.1 vs 12.4Higher yield: RF 3.45% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RF -31.9% vs -49.1%Higher 5y return: RF +83.5% vs -34.4%
-40%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). NCLH · RF

Year-by-year returns

YearNCLHRF
2022-41.0%+2.3%
2023+63.7%-5.7%
2024+28.4%+27.0%
2025-13.3%+20.2%
2026-25.4%+14.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are NCLH and RF good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.59 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between NCLH and RF?

The NCLH/RF correlation stands at 0.59 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.49, 5 years: 0.53), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RF a good diversifier for NCLH?

To a limited degree. At 0.59 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.59 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/nclh-vs-rf.json

NCLH vs RF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.59NCLH vs RF0.59

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![NCLH vs RF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/nclh-vs-rf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/nclh-vs-rf/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: NCLH correlations · RF correlations