PairBook
HomeMWG › MWG vs TWIN

MWG vs TWIN: Correlation

Multi Ways Holdings Limited Class A (MWG) and Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.28
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
1241.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MWG and TWIN?

Over the past 3 years, MWG and TWIN moved with a correlation of 0.28, which is weak. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1241.9 %².

TWIN is one of the assets that tracks MWG most closely: it ranks #2 out of the 10 assets we track against MWG. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TWIN ahead by 132.8 points (-46.6% versus +86.2%). Note the risk asymmetry: MWG runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MWG vs TWIN: side by side

MWG (Multi Ways Holdings Limited Class A)TWIN (Twin Disc, Incorporated)
1-year return-46.6%+86.2%
5-year returnn/a+98.7%
Volatility (ann.)87.1%50.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.470.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-81.5%-64.4%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)12.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.68%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: TWIN 0.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TWIN -64.4% vs -81.5%
-65%0%+90%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MWG · TWIN

Year-by-year returns

YearMWGTWIN
2022-11.3%
2023+66.7%
2024+26.2%-26.4%
2025-6.3%+44.4%
2026-52.3%+41.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MWG and TWIN good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.28, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MWG and TWIN?

The MWG/TWIN correlation stands at 0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.24, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TWIN a good diversifier for MWG?

A fair diversifier. At 0.28, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mwg-vs-twin.json

MWG vs TWIN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.28MWG vs TWIN0.28

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MWG vs TWIN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mwg-vs-twin.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mwg-vs-twin/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MWG correlations · TWIN correlations