PairBook
HomeCIRC › CIRC vs MWG

CIRC vs MWG: Correlation

Circle8 Group, Inc. (CIRC) and Multi Ways Holdings Limited Class A (MWG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3954.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CIRC and MWG?

On 3 years of weekly data the CIRC/MWG correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.27 over 1 year against -0.22 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -3954.7 %².

Out of 14 assets tracked against CIRC, MWG lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: MWG led by 36.9 percentage points, -83.5% for CIRC against -46.6% for MWG. Note the risk asymmetry: CIRC runs 2.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CIRC vs MWG: side by side

CIRC (Circle8 Group, Inc.)MWG (Multi Ways Holdings Limited Class A)
1-year return-83.5%-46.6%
5-year return-99.7%n/a
Volatility (ann.)207.6%87.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.240.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.0%-81.5%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MWG -81.5% vs -98.0%
-85%0%+28%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CIRC · MWG

Year-by-year returns

YearCIRCMWG
2022-84.4%
2023-64.5%
2024+18.2%+26.2%
2025-72.7%-6.3%
2026-46.8%-52.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CIRC and MWG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CIRC and MWG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CIRC and MWG is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.27 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MWG a good diversifier for CIRC?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/circ-vs-mwg.json

CIRC vs MWG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22CIRC vs MWG-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CIRC vs MWG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/circ-vs-mwg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/circ-vs-mwg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CIRC correlations · MWG correlations