PairBook
HomeMRSH › MRSH vs RMCF

MRSH vs RMCF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Marsh McLennan (MRSH) and Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (RMCF) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-270.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MRSH and RMCF?

Over the past 3 years, MRSH and RMCF moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.29 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -270.5 %².

RMCF is close to the least connected end of MRSH's tracked universe, ranking #35 of 38. Over the last 12 months MRSH came out ahead by 13.9 percentage points (-6.0% against -19.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: RMCF runs 3.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MRSH vs RMCF: side by side

MRSH (Marsh McLennan)RMCF (Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.)
1-year return-6.0%-19.9%
5-year return+31.3%-84.3%
Volatility (ann.)18.1%68.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.330.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-34.4%-87.0%
Market cap$90.7B
P/E (trailing)23.6
Dividend yield1.91%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: MRSH 1.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MRSH -34.4% vs -87.0%Higher 5y return: MRSH +31.3% vs -84.3%
-46%0%+79%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MRSH · RMCF

Year-by-year returns

YearMRSHRMCF
2022-3.5%-27.4%
2023+16.1%-19.3%
2024+13.7%-47.2%
2025-11.3%-21.8%
2026+4.0%-38.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MRSH and RMCF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MRSH and RMCF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MRSH and RMCF is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.29 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is RMCF a good diversifier for MRSH?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mrsh-vs-rmcf.json

MRSH vs RMCF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22MRSH vs RMCF-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MRSH vs RMCF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mrsh-vs-rmcf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mrsh-vs-rmcf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MRSH correlations · RMCF correlations