PairBook
HomeMRSH › MRSH vs XTIA

MRSH vs XTIA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Marsh McLennan (MRSH) and XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.11
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-548.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MRSH and XTIA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MRSH and XTIA correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.11) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.24). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -548.6 %².

Out of 38 assets tracked against MRSH, XTIA lands near the bottom at #37. The last year tells two different stories: MRSH led by 19.0 percentage points, -6.0% for MRSH against -25.0% for XTIA. One caveat on sizing: XTIA is 7.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MRSH vs XTIA: side by side

MRSH (Marsh McLennan)XTIA (XTI Aerospace, Inc.)
1-year return-6.0%-25.0%
5-year return+31.3%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)18.1%127.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.330.29
Max drawdown (3Y)-34.4%-100.0%
Market cap$90.7B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)23.6
Dividend yield1.91%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: MRSH 1.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MRSH -34.4% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: MRSH +31.3% vs -100.0%
-32%0%+35%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MRSH · XTIA

Year-by-year returns

YearMRSHXTIA
2022-3.5%-96.2%
2023+16.1%-96.7%
2024+13.7%-99.2%
2025-11.3%-88.5%
2026+4.0%+11.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MRSH and XTIA good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MRSH and XTIA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MRSH and XTIA is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.11 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is XTIA a good diversifier for MRSH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mrsh-vs-xtia.json

MRSH vs XTIA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24MRSH vs XTIA-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MRSH vs XTIA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mrsh-vs-xtia.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mrsh-vs-xtia/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MRSH correlations · XTIA correlations