PairBook
HomeMRKR › MRKR vs USB

MRKR vs USB: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Marker Therapeutics, Inc. (MRKR) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) carry a correlation of 0.39, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
933.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MRKR and USB?

Over the past 3 years, MRKR and USB moved with a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.21 versus 0.39 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.20, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 933.1 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against MRKR, USB ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MRKR outperformed by 22.2 percentage points (+55.3% for MRKR against +33.1% for USB). Note the risk asymmetry: MRKR runs 3.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MRKR vs USB: side by side

MRKR (Marker Therapeutics, Inc.)USB (U.S. Bancorp)
1-year return+55.3%+33.1%
5-year return-92.3%+36.0%
Volatility (ann.)88.6%27.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.921.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.2%-30.6%
Market cap$97.2B
P/E (trailing)12.5
Dividend yield0.00%3.31%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: USB 3.31% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: USB -30.6% vs -86.2%Higher 5y return: USB +36.0% vs -92.3%
-6%0%+133%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MRKR · USB

Year-by-year returns

YearMRKRUSB
2022-71.6%-19.1%
2023+103.7%+4.8%
2024-43.5%+15.6%
2025-52.1%+16.5%
2026-2.0%+19.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MRKR and USB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MRKR and USB?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MRKR and USB is 0.39 over 3 years, 0.21 over 1 year and 0.20 over 5 years.

Is USB a good diversifier for MRKR?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mrkr-vs-usb.json

MRKR vs USB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39MRKR vs USB0.39

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MRKR vs USB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mrkr-vs-usb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mrkr-vs-usb/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MRKR correlations · USB correlations