PairBook
HomeHQL › HQL vs MRKR

HQL vs MRKR: Correlation

abrdn Life Sciences Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest (HQL) and Marker Therapeutics, Inc. (MRKR) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.40.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
826.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HQL and MRKR?

On 3 years of weekly data the HQL/MRKR correlation comes out at 0.40, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.39 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.33, and annualized covariance runs at 826.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, MRKR places #63 of the 72 assets tracked against HQL. The last year tells two different stories: HQL led by 20.6 percentage points, +75.9% for HQL against +55.3% for MRKR. One caveat on sizing: MRKR is 3.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HQL vs MRKR: side by side

HQL (abrdn Life Sciences Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest)MRKR (Marker Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+75.9%+55.3%
5-year return+74.1%-92.3%
Volatility (ann.)23.5%88.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.881.92
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.1%-86.2%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)3.2
Dividend yield8.87%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: HQL 8.87% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HQL -25.1% vs -86.2%Higher 5y return: HQL +74.1% vs -92.3%
-4%0%+133%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. HQL · MRKR

Year-by-year returns

YearHQLMRKR
2022-19.2%-71.6%
2023+4.2%+103.7%
2024+11.0%-43.5%
2025+45.5%-52.1%
2026+40.9%-2.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HQL and MRKR good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.40, HQL and MRKR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HQL and MRKR?

The HQL/MRKR correlation stands at 0.40 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.39, 5 years: 0.33), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MRKR a good diversifier for HQL?

Reasonably. At 0.40, HQL and MRKR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

A reading of 0.40 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hql-vs-mrkr.json

HQL vs MRKR: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40HQL vs MRKR0.40

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HQL vs MRKR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hql-vs-mrkr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hql-vs-mrkr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HQL correlations · MRKR correlations