PairBook
HomeMMS › MMS vs QQQ

MMS vs QQQ: Correlation

How closely do Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.19, which is weak.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.19
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.15
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
113.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MMS and QQQ?

Over the past 3 years, MMS and QQQ moved with a correlation of 0.19, which is weak. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.15 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.27, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 113.3 %².

QQQ is close to the least connected end of MMS's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 12. The last year tells two different stories: QQQ led by 57.0 percentage points, -30.7% for MMS against +26.3% for QQQ. Note the risk asymmetry: MMS runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MMS vs QQQ: side by side

MMS (Maximus, Inc.)QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust)
1-year return-30.7%+26.3%
5-year return-25.0%+95.4%
Volatility (ann.)30.4%19.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.501.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-45.1%-22.8%
Market cap$3.1B
P/E (trailing)8.7
Dividend yield2.14%0.44%
Expense ratio0.18%
Assets under management$452.8B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Growth & Tech
Higher yield: MMS 2.14% vs 0.44%Smaller drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs -45.1%Higher 5y return: QQQ +95.4% vs -25.0%

QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.

-37%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MMS · QQQ

Year-by-year returns

YearMMSQQQ
2022-6.4%-32.6%
2023+16.0%+54.9%
2024-9.7%+25.6%
2025+17.5%+20.8%
2026-29.9%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MMS and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of 0.19, MMS and QQQ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MMS and QQQ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.19 over 3 years, with 0.15 over the last year and 0.27 over 5 years.

Is QQQ a good diversifier for MMS?

Yes. With a correlation of 0.19, MMS and QQQ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of 0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mms-vs-qqq.json

MMS vs QQQ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.19MMS vs QQQ0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MMS vs QQQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mms-vs-qqq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mms-vs-qqq/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MMS correlations · QQQ correlations