PairBook
HomeBR › BR vs MMS

BR vs MMS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) and Maximus, Inc. (MMS) carry a correlation of 0.45, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.45
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
310.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BR and MMS?

On 3 years of weekly data the BR/MMS correlation comes out at 0.45, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.48 over 1 year against 0.45 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.42, and annualized covariance runs at 310.6 %².

Among the 45 assets we track against BR, MMS ranks #29 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: -27.6% for BR against -30.7% for MMS.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BR vs MMS: side by side

BR (Broadridge Financial Solutions)MMS (Maximus, Inc.)
1-year return-27.6%-30.7%
5-year return+16.0%-25.0%
Volatility (ann.)22.6%30.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.650.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.2%-45.1%
Market cap$20.9B$3.1B
P/E (trailing)18.98.7
Dividend yield2.15%2.14%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: MMS 8.7 vs 18.9Higher yield: BR 2.15% vs 2.14%Smaller drawdown: MMS -45.1% vs -48.2%Higher 5y return: BR +16.0% vs -25.0%
-44%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BR · MMS

Year-by-year returns

YearBRMMS
2022-25.3%-6.4%
2023+56.2%+16.0%
2024+11.7%-9.7%
2025+0.3%+17.5%
2026-17.0%-29.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BR and MMS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.45 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BR and MMS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.45 over 3 years, with 0.48 over the last year and 0.42 over 5 years.

Is MMS a good diversifier for BR?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.45 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.45 mean?

A reading of 0.45 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/br-vs-mms.json

BR vs MMS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.45BR vs MMS0.45

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BR vs MMS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/br-vs-mms.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/br-vs-mms/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BR correlations · MMS correlations