PairBook
HomeMLP › MLP vs VTV

MLP vs VTV: Correlation

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.48.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.37
long-run
Ann. covariance
226.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MLP and VTV?

Over the past 3 years, MLP and VTV moved with a correlation of 0.48, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.37) than the 3-year average (0.48). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.37, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 226.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, VTV places #5 of the 10 assets tracked against MLP. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VTV ahead by 33.9 points (-8.2% versus +25.7%). Risk is not evenly split, since MLP carries 3.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MLP vs VTV: side by side

MLP (Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.)VTV (Vanguard Value ETF)
1-year return-8.2%+25.7%
5-year return+43.7%+79.1%
Volatility (ann.)39.6%11.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.030.65
Max drawdown (3Y)-45.5%-14.5%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%1.86%
Expense ratio0.03%
Assets under management$256.4B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Style
Higher yield: VTV 1.86% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VTV -14.5% vs -45.5%Higher 5y return: VTV +79.1% vs +43.7%

On the fund side, VTV sits in the Large Value category at Vanguard, with $256.4B under management, 308 holdings, a 0.03% expense ratio, a 1.86% trailing dividend yield.

-15%0%+27%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MLP · VTV

Year-by-year returns

YearMLPVTV
2022-5.4%-2.1%
2023+68.7%+9.3%
2024+38.3%+16.0%
2025-22.9%+15.3%
2026-6.5%+19.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MLP and VTV good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.48, MLP and VTV keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MLP and VTV?

The MLP/VTV correlation stands at 0.48 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.37, 5 years: 0.37), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VTV a good diversifier for MLP?

Reasonably. At 0.48, MLP and VTV keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mlp-vs-vtv.json

MLP vs VTV: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48MLP vs VTV0.48

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MLP vs VTV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mlp-vs-vtv.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mlp-vs-vtv/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MLP correlations · VTV correlations