PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs MLP

FNGD vs MLP: Correlation

MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.19
long-run
Ann. covariance
-586.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and MLP?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and MLP correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.03) than the 3-year average (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.19, with an annualized covariance of -586.1 %².

Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, MLP ranks #91 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MLP led by 47.5 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against -8.2% for MLP. One caveat on sizing: FNGD is 1.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs MLP: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)MLP (Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%-8.2%
5-year return-99.4%+43.7%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%39.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-45.5%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MLP -45.5% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: MLP +43.7% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · MLP

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDMLP
2022+52.2%-5.4%
2023-90.1%+68.7%
2024-76.6%+38.3%
2025-61.4%-22.9%
2026-49.5%-6.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and MLP good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and MLP?

The FNGD/MLP correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.03, 5 years: -0.19), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MLP a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-mlp.json

FNGD vs MLP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20FNGD vs MLP-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs MLP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-mlp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-mlp/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · MLP correlations