PairBook
HomeMFA › MFA vs RWT

MFA vs RWT: Correlation

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.61.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.61
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.54
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.69
long-run
Ann. covariance
493.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MFA and RWT?

On 3 years of weekly data the MFA/RWT correlation comes out at 0.61, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.54 over 1 year against 0.61 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.69, and annualized covariance runs at 493.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, RWT places #12 of the 23 assets tracked against MFA. The trailing year gives MFA the advantage: +2.8% versus -11.8%, a 14.6-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MFA vs RWT: side by side

MFA (MFA Financial, Inc.)RWT (Redwood Trust, Inc.)
1-year return+2.8%-11.8%
5-year return-8.1%-35.7%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%31.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.640.87
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.6%-33.8%
Market cap$0.9B$0.6B
P/E (trailing)8.8
Dividend yield16.36%15.62%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MFA 16.36% vs 15.62%Smaller drawdown: MFA -31.6% vs -33.8%Higher 5y return: MFA -8.1% vs -35.7%
-20%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MFA · RWT

Year-by-year returns

YearMFARWT
2022-37.2%-42.3%
2023+30.7%+21.6%
2024+2.6%-2.6%
2025+6.1%-4.1%
2026+2.6%-10.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MFA and RWT good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.61 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MFA and RWT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.61 over 3 years, with 0.54 over the last year and 0.69 over 5 years.

Is RWT a good diversifier for MFA?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.61 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.61 mean?

A reading of 0.61 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mfa-vs-rwt.json

MFA vs RWT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.61MFA vs RWT0.61

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MFA vs RWT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mfa-vs-rwt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mfa-vs-rwt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MFA correlations · RWT correlations