PairBook
HomeMFA › MFA vs SMHB

MFA vs SMHB: Correlation

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2x Leveraged Small Cap High Dividend ETN (SMHB) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.71.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.73
long-run
Ann. covariance
712.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MFA and SMHB?

On 3 years of weekly data the MFA/SMHB correlation comes out at 0.71, strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.57) runs below the 3-year figure (0.71). The 5-year figure is 0.73, and annualized covariance runs at 712.6 %².

Within MFA's tracked universe of 23 assets, SMHB comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: +2.8% for MFA against +7.4% for SMHB. Note the risk asymmetry: SMHB runs 1.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MFA vs SMHB: side by side

MFA (MFA Financial, Inc.)SMHB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2x Leveraged Small Cap High Dividend ETN)
1-year return+2.8%+7.4%
5-year return-8.1%-13.5%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%39.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.641.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.6%-45.0%
Market cap$0.9B
P/E (trailing)8.8
Dividend yield16.36%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MFA -31.6% vs -45.0%Higher 5y return: MFA -8.1% vs -13.5%
-22%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MFA · SMHB

Year-by-year returns

YearMFASMHB
2022-37.2%-36.0%
2023+30.7%+36.0%
2024+2.6%-15.8%
2025+6.1%-7.7%
2026+2.6%+22.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MFA and SMHB good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MFA and SMHB?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.71 over 3 years, with 0.57 over the last year and 0.73 over 5 years.

Is SMHB a good diversifier for MFA?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

A reading of 0.71 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mfa-vs-smhb.json

MFA vs SMHB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71MFA vs SMHB0.71

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MFA vs SMHB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mfa-vs-smhb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mfa-vs-smhb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MFA correlations · SMHB correlations