MET vs VTV: Correlation
How closely do MetLife (MET) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.69, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MET and VTV?
On 3 years of weekly data the MET/VTV correlation comes out at 0.69, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.34) than the 3-year average (0.69). The 5-year figure is 0.72, and annualized covariance runs at 191.9 %².
By 3-year correlation, VTV places #10 of the 37 assets tracked against MET. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +22.1% against +25.7%. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.37 and 0.86, a moderate band. Note the risk asymmetry: MET runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MET vs VTV: side by side
| MET (MetLife) | VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +22.1% | +25.7% |
| 5-year return | +80.8% | +79.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 23.3% | 11.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.89 | 0.65 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -22.0% | -14.5% |
| Market cap | $61.2B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 18.5 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.38% | 1.86% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.03% |
| Assets under management | – | $256.4B |
| Sector / category | Financials | ETF · US Style |
On the fund side, VTV sits in the Large Value category at Vanguard, with $256.4B under management, 308 holdings, a 0.03% expense ratio, a 1.86% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MET | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +19.2% | -2.1% |
| 2023 | -5.5% | +9.3% |
| 2024 | +27.7% | +16.0% |
| 2025 | -0.8% | +15.3% |
| 2026 | +24.5% | +19.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Fund exposure
Keep in mind that VTV holds MET at a 0.2% weight, which makes a slice of this correlation mechanical rather than coincidental.
Are MET and VTV good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.69 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MET and VTV?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.69 over 3 years, with 0.34 over the last year and 0.72 over 5 years.
Is VTV a good diversifier for MET?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.69 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/met-vs-vtv.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/met-vs-vtv/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MET correlations · VTV correlations
