EQH vs MET: Correlation
Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) and MetLife (MET) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.72.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are EQH and MET?
Over the past 3 years, EQH and MET moved with a correlation of 0.72, which is strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.64 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.78, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 455.8 %².
Few assets follow EQH as closely as MET, which ranks #3 of 20 tracked partners. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MET ahead by 26.3 points (-4.2% versus +22.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
EQH vs MET: side by side
| EQH (Equitable Holdings, Inc.) | MET (MetLife) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -4.2% | +22.1% |
| 5-year return | +83.5% | +80.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.3% | 23.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.19 | 0.89 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -35.8% | -22.0% |
| Market cap | $13.7B | $61.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 18.5 |
| Dividend yield | 2.29% | 2.38% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Financials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | EQH | MET |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -10.2% | +19.2% |
| 2023 | +19.6% | -5.5% |
| 2024 | +45.0% | +27.7% |
| 2025 | +3.2% | -0.8% |
| 2026 | +7.4% | +24.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are EQH and MET good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.72 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between EQH and MET?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.72 over 3 years, with 0.64 over the last year and 0.78 over 5 years.
Is MET a good diversifier for EQH?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.72 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.72 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.72 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eqh-vs-met.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eqh-vs-met/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: EQH correlations · MET correlations
