MED vs SATL: Correlation
MEDIFAST INC (MED) and Satellogic Inc. (SATL) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.35.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MED and SATL?
Over the past 3 years, MED and SATL moved with a correlation of 0.35, which is moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.53) runs above the 3-year figure (0.35). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.22, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2271.8 %².
By 3-year correlation, SATL places #7 of the 12 assets tracked against MED. The last year tells two different stories: SATL led by 59.8 percentage points, -14.7% for MED against +45.1% for SATL. Risk is not evenly split, since SATL carries 2.8 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MED vs SATL: side by side
| MED (MEDIFAST INC) | SATL (Satellogic Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -14.7% | +45.1% |
| 5-year return | -94.1% | -45.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 47.7% | 134.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 1.81 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.8% | -73.2% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $0.8B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MED | SATL |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -42.3% | -68.6% |
| 2023 | -38.3% | -42.6% |
| 2024 | -73.8% | +62.9% |
| 2025 | -39.4% | -34.4% |
| 2026 | +13.9% | +184.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MED and SATL good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.35, MED and SATL keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MED and SATL?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.35 over 3 years, with 0.53 over the last year and 0.22 over 5 years.
Is SATL a good diversifier for MED?
Reasonably. At 0.35, MED and SATL keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/med-vs-satl.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/med-vs-satl/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MED correlations · SATL correlations
