MED vs OCG: Correlation
MEDIFAST INC (MED) and Oriental Culture Holding LTD (OCG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MED and OCG?
On 3 years of weekly data the MED/OCG correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.14 over 1 year against -0.19 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -1322.6 %².
Out of 12 assets tracked against MED, OCG lands near the bottom at #10. The last year tells two different stories: MED led by 85.2 percentage points, -14.7% for MED against -99.9% for OCG. Risk is not evenly split, since OCG carries 3.1 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MED vs OCG: side by side
| MED (MEDIFAST INC) | OCG (Oriental Culture Holding LTD) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -14.7% | -99.9% |
| 5-year return | -94.1% | -100.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 47.7% | 149.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 0.32 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.8% | -100.0% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MED | OCG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -42.3% | -90.2% |
| 2023 | -38.3% | -42.9% |
| 2024 | -73.8% | -14.0% |
| 2025 | -39.4% | -92.4% |
| 2026 | +13.9% | -97.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MED and OCG good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MED and OCG?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.14 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.
Is OCG a good diversifier for MED?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/med-vs-ocg.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/med-vs-ocg/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MED correlations · OCG correlations
