MED vs MKZR: Correlation
How closely do MEDIFAST INC (MED) and MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MED and MKZR?
Over the past 3 years, MED and MKZR moved with a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.56) than the 3-year average (0.37). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1523.7 %².
By 3-year correlation, MKZR places #6 of the 12 assets tracked against MED. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MED ahead by 61.0 points (-14.7% versus -75.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: MKZR runs 1.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MED vs MKZR: side by side
| MED (MEDIFAST INC) | MKZR (MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -14.7% | -75.7% |
| 5-year return | -94.1% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 47.7% | 91.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.8% | -97.8% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MED | MKZR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -42.3% | – |
| 2023 | -38.3% | – |
| 2024 | -73.8% | – |
| 2025 | -39.4% | -86.7% |
| 2026 | +13.9% | -63.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MED and MKZR good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.37, MED and MKZR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MED and MKZR?
The MED/MKZR correlation stands at 0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.56, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is MKZR a good diversifier for MED?
Reasonably. At 0.37, MED and MKZR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.37 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/med-vs-mkzr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/med-vs-mkzr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MED correlations · MKZR correlations
