PairBook
HomeMCI › MCI vs WST

MCI vs WST: Correlation

Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) and West Pharmaceutical Services (WST) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-219.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCI and WST?

On 3 years of weekly data the MCI/WST correlation comes out at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.04) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.23). The 5-year figure is -0.07, and annualized covariance runs at -219.6 %².

WST is close to the least connected end of MCI's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 12. The last year tells two different stories: WST led by 48.8 percentage points, -7.7% for MCI against +41.1% for WST. One caveat on sizing: WST is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCI vs WST: side by side

MCI (Barings Corporate Investors)WST (West Pharmaceutical Services)
1-year return-7.7%+41.1%
5-year return+77.0%-22.4%
Volatility (ann.)25.3%38.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.130.86
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.9%-53.8%
Market cap$0.4B$24.4B
P/E (trailing)13.244.8
Dividend yield8.73%0.25%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Lower P/E: MCI 13.2 vs 44.8Higher yield: MCI 8.73% vs 0.25%Smaller drawdown: MCI -27.9% vs -53.8%Higher 5y return: MCI +77.0% vs -22.4%
-18%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MCI · WST

Year-by-year returns

YearMCIWST
2022-5.9%-49.7%
2023+44.5%+50.0%
2024+20.8%-6.8%
2025-3.7%-15.7%
2026+3.7%+26.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCI and WST good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCI and WST?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MCI and WST is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.04 over 1 year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is WST a good diversifier for MCI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mci-vs-wst.json

MCI vs WST: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23MCI vs WST-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MCI vs WST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mci-vs-wst.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mci-vs-wst/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCI correlations · WST correlations