GMHS vs MCI: Correlation
How closely do Gamehaus Holdings Inc. - Class A (GMHS) and Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.28, which is weak.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GMHS and MCI?
On 3 years of weekly data the GMHS/MCI correlation comes out at 0.28, weak. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.14) runs below the 3-year figure (0.28). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 624.9 %².
Within GMHS's tracked universe of 28 assets, MCI comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MCI led by 27.4 percentage points, -35.1% for GMHS against -7.7% for MCI. Risk is not evenly split, since GMHS carries 3.4 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GMHS vs MCI: side by side
| GMHS (Gamehaus Holdings Inc. - Class A) | MCI (Barings Corporate Investors) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -35.1% | -7.7% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +77.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 86.7% | 25.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.16 | 0.13 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -95.8% | -27.9% |
| Market cap | – | $0.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 8.1 | 13.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 8.73% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GMHS | MCI |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -5.9% |
| 2023 | – | +44.5% |
| 2024 | +8.1% | +20.8% |
| 2025 | -91.6% | -3.7% |
| 2026 | -23.0% | +3.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GMHS and MCI good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.28, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GMHS and MCI?
The GMHS/MCI correlation stands at 0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.14, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is MCI a good diversifier for GMHS?
A fair diversifier. At 0.28, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gmhs-vs-mci.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gmhs-vs-mci/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GMHS correlations · MCI correlations
