PairBook
HomeMCFT › MCFT vs VTRS

MCFT vs VTRS: Correlation

How closely do MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) and Viatris (VTRS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.49
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
632.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCFT and VTRS?

On 3 years of weekly data the MCFT/VTRS correlation comes out at 0.49, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.51 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.42, and annualized covariance runs at 632.6 %².

Among the 22 assets we track against MCFT, VTRS ranks #13 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: VTRS led by 62.2 percentage points, +5.6% for MCFT against +67.8% for VTRS.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCFT vs VTRS: side by side

MCFT (MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.)VTRS (Viatris)
1-year return+5.6%+67.8%
5-year return-7.0%+44.6%
Volatility (ann.)39.1%32.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.030.79
Max drawdown (3Y)-41.1%-45.0%
Market cap$0.6B$19.4B
P/E (trailing)36.1
Dividend yield0.00%2.85%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: VTRS 2.85% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCFT -41.1% vs -45.0%Higher 5y return: VTRS +44.6% vs -7.0%
-22%0%+72%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MCFT · VTRS

Year-by-year returns

YearMCFTVTRS
2022-8.7%-14.3%
2023-12.5%+2.1%
2024-15.8%+19.7%
2025-0.8%+5.1%
2026+27.9%+38.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCFT and VTRS good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCFT and VTRS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.49 over 3 years, with 0.51 over the last year and 0.42 over 5 years.

Is VTRS a good diversifier for MCFT?

A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?

A reading of 0.49 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcft-vs-vtrs.json

MCFT vs VTRS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.49MCFT vs VTRS0.49

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MCFT vs VTRS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mcft-vs-vtrs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcft-vs-vtrs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCFT correlations · VTRS correlations