BC vs MCFT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) and MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) carry a correlation of 0.69, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BC and MCFT?
On 3 years of weekly data the BC/MCFT correlation comes out at 0.69, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.78) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.70, and annualized covariance runs at 968.1 %².
Among the 58 assets we track against BC, MCFT ranks #9 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BC ahead by 16.1 points (+21.7% versus +5.6%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BC vs MCFT: side by side
| BC (Brunswick Corporation) | MCFT (MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.7% | +5.6% |
| 5-year return | -15.3% | -7.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.8% | 39.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.22 | 1.03 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -56.5% | -41.1% |
| Market cap | $5.0B | $0.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 36.1 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BC | MCFT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.1% | -8.7% |
| 2023 | +36.9% | -12.5% |
| 2024 | -31.8% | -15.8% |
| 2025 | +18.1% | -0.8% |
| 2026 | +6.2% | +27.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BC and MCFT good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.69 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BC and MCFT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.69 over 3 years, with 0.78 over the last year and 0.70 over 5 years.
Is MCFT a good diversifier for BC?
To a limited degree. At 0.69 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.69 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bc-vs-mcft.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bc-vs-mcft/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BC correlations · MCFT correlations
