PairBook
HomeMBBC › MBBC vs POLA

MBBC vs POLA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Marathon Bancorp, Inc. (MBBC) and Polar Power, Inc. (POLA) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-597.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MBBC and POLA?

On 3 years of weekly data the MBBC/POLA correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.22 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.17, and annualized covariance runs at -597.8 %².

POLA is close to the least connected end of MBBC's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 13. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MBBC outperformed by 78.7 percentage points (+48.3% for MBBC against -30.4% for POLA). Risk is not evenly split, since POLA carries 2.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MBBC vs POLA: side by side

MBBC (Marathon Bancorp, Inc.)POLA (Polar Power, Inc.)
1-year return+48.3%-30.4%
5-year return+103.0%-97.1%
Volatility (ann.)31.3%77.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.071.65
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.3%-87.6%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)36.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MBBC -28.3% vs -87.6%Higher 5y return: MBBC +103.0% vs -97.1%
-46%0%+71%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MBBC · POLA

Year-by-year returns

YearMBBCPOLA
2022+4.7%-64.0%
2023-17.0%-68.2%
2024+49.9%+11.5%
2025+19.2%-47.8%
2026+26.6%-13.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MBBC and POLA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, MBBC and POLA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MBBC and POLA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MBBC and POLA is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.22 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is POLA a good diversifier for MBBC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, MBBC and POLA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mbbc-vs-pola.json

MBBC vs POLA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25MBBC vs POLA-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MBBC vs POLA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mbbc-vs-pola.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mbbc-vs-pola/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MBBC correlations · POLA correlations