PairBook
HomeJL › JL vs MBBC

JL vs MBBC: Correlation

How closely do J-Long Group Limited - Class A (JL) and Marathon Bancorp, Inc. (MBBC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.47
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.02
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
6352.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are JL and MBBC?

Over the past 3 years, JL and MBBC moved with a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.02) runs below the 3-year figure (0.47). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 6352.3 %².

Among the 58 assets we track against JL, MBBC ranks #8 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MBBC led by 64.7 percentage points, -16.4% for JL against +48.3% for MBBC. Note the risk asymmetry: JL runs 18.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

JL vs MBBC: side by side

JL (J-Long Group Limited - Class A)MBBC (Marathon Bancorp, Inc.)
1-year return-16.4%+48.3%
5-year returnn/a+103.0%
Volatility (ann.)580.0%31.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.02-0.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.6%-28.3%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)6.536.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: JL 6.5 vs 36.7Smaller drawdown: MBBC -28.3% vs -98.6%
-41%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). JL · MBBC

Year-by-year returns

YearJLMBBC
2022+4.7%
2023-17.0%
2024+49.9%
2025+67.1%+19.2%
2026-20.1%+26.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are JL and MBBC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.47 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between JL and MBBC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.47 over 3 years, with 0.02 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MBBC a good diversifier for JL?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.47 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jl-vs-mbbc.json

JL vs MBBC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.47JL vs MBBC0.47

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![JL vs MBBC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/jl-vs-mbbc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jl-vs-mbbc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: JL correlations · MBBC correlations