PairBook
HomeJL › JL vs MGX

JL vs MGX: Correlation

How closely do J-Long Group Limited - Class A (JL) and Metagenomi Therapeutics, Inc. (MGX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.57, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.57
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
28610.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are JL and MGX?

Over the past 3 years, JL and MGX moved with a correlation of 0.57, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.09) than the 3-year average (0.57). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 28610.0 %².

In JL's tracked universe of 58 assets, MGX sits right near the top at #3. The last year tells two different stories: JL led by 18.5 percentage points, -16.4% for JL against -34.9% for MGX. One caveat on sizing: JL is 6.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

JL vs MGX: side by side

JL (J-Long Group Limited - Class A)MGX (Metagenomi Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return-16.4%-34.9%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)580.0%86.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.021.23
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.6%-90.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)6.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MGX -90.7% vs -98.6%
-41%0%+60%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). JL · MGX

Are JL and MGX good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.57 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between JL and MGX?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.57 over 3 years, with 0.09 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MGX a good diversifier for JL?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.57 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.57 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jl-vs-mgx.json

JL vs MGX: 3-year weekly correlation 0.57JL vs MGX0.57

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![JL vs MGX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/jl-vs-mgx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jl-vs-mgx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: JL correlations · MGX correlations