MA vs SONM: Correlation
Mastercard (MA) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MA and SONM?
Over the past 3 years, MA and SONM moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.30 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.01, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -493.8 %².
Within MA's tracked universe of 46 assets, SONM comes in at #41 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MA led by 70.0 percentage points, +0.8% for MA against -69.2% for SONM. Risk is not evenly split, since SONM carries 5.5 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MA vs SONM: side by side
| MA (Mastercard) | SONM (DNA X, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +0.8% | -69.2% |
| 5-year return | +72.6% | -99.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 19.3% | 106.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.77 | 0.06 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -20.9% | -98.5% |
| Market cap | $518.4B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 32.9 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Financials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MA | SONM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -2.7% | -53.9% |
| 2023 | +23.4% | +72.9% |
| 2024 | +24.2% | -57.1% |
| 2025 | +9.0% | -94.5% |
| 2026 | +4.2% | +3.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MA and SONM good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MA and SONM?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.30 over the last year and 0.01 over 5 years.
Is SONM a good diversifier for MA?
Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ma-vs-sonm.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ma-vs-sonm/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MA correlations · SONM correlations
