LZB vs ROST: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) and Ross Stores (ROST) carry a correlation of 0.46, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LZB and ROST?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LZB and ROST correlate at 0.46, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.46) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.43, with an annualized covariance of 372.0 %².
Within LZB's tracked universe of 14 assets, ROST comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ROST outperformed by 63.2 percentage points (-8.9% for LZB against +54.3% for ROST).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LZB vs ROST: side by side
| LZB (La-Z-Boy Incorporated) | ROST (Ross Stores) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -8.9% | +54.3% |
| 5-year return | +3.8% | +105.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 33.7% | 24.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.78 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -37.9% | -21.1% |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $73.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | 16.4 | 27.8 |
| Dividend yield | 2.93% | 0.72% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Consumer Discretionary |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LZB | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -35.5% | +2.9% |
| 2023 | +65.7% | +20.6% |
| 2024 | +20.4% | +10.4% |
| 2025 | -12.5% | +20.4% |
| 2026 | -11.0% | +28.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LZB and ROST good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.46 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LZB and ROST?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.46 over 3 years, with 0.46 over the last year and 0.43 over 5 years.
Is ROST a good diversifier for LZB?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.46 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?
A reading of 0.46 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lzb-vs-rost.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lzb-vs-rost/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LZB correlations · ROST correlations
