PairBook
HomeLZB › LZB vs PSIG

LZB vs PSIG: Correlation

La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) and PS International Group Ltd. (PSIG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1467.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LZB and PSIG?

Over the past 3 years, LZB and PSIG moved with a correlation of -0.28, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.37 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1467.9 %².

PSIG is close to the least connected end of LZB's tracked universe, ranking #13 of 14. The last year tells two different stories: LZB led by 45.0 percentage points, -8.9% for LZB against -53.9% for PSIG. Note the risk asymmetry: PSIG runs 4.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LZB vs PSIG: side by side

LZB (La-Z-Boy Incorporated)PSIG (PS International Group Ltd.)
1-year return-8.9%-53.9%
5-year return+3.8%n/a
Volatility (ann.)33.7%157.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.780.97
Max drawdown (3Y)-37.9%-96.0%
Market cap$1.3B
P/E (trailing)16.4
Dividend yield2.93%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LZB 2.93% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LZB -37.9% vs -96.0%
-70%0%+218%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LZB · PSIG

Year-by-year returns

YearLZBPSIG
2022-35.5%
2023+65.7%
2024+20.4%
2025-12.5%+8.3%
2026-11.0%-62.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LZB and PSIG good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LZB and PSIG?

The LZB/PSIG correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.37, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PSIG a good diversifier for LZB?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lzb-vs-psig.json

LZB vs PSIG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28LZB vs PSIG-0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LZB vs PSIG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lzb-vs-psig.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lzb-vs-psig/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LZB correlations · PSIG correlations