PairBook
HomeLZ › LZ vs SNGX

LZ vs SNGX: Correlation

How closely do LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) and Soligenix, Inc. (SNGX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.24, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.02
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2533.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LZ and SNGX?

Over the past 3 years, LZ and SNGX moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.02) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2533.5 %².

Out of 15 assets tracked against LZ, SNGX lands near the bottom at #12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LZ outperformed by 41.4 percentage points (-45.9% for LZ against -87.3% for SNGX). One caveat on sizing: SNGX is 4.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LZ vs SNGX: side by side

LZ (LegalZoom.com, Inc.)SNGX (Soligenix, Inc.)
1-year return-45.9%-87.3%
5-year return-82.4%-99.8%
Volatility (ann.)51.4%205.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.940.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-60.0%-98.2%
Market cap$1.0B
P/E (trailing)67.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LZ -60.0% vs -98.2%Higher 5y return: LZ -82.4% vs -99.8%
-90%0%+6%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LZ · SNGX

Year-by-year returns

YearLZSNGX
2022-51.8%-31.8%
2023+46.0%-88.7%
2024-33.5%-77.8%
2025+32.2%-50.4%
2026-39.1%-71.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LZ and SNGX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, LZ and SNGX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LZ and SNGX?

The LZ/SNGX correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.02, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SNGX a good diversifier for LZ?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, LZ and SNGX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lz-vs-sngx.json

LZ vs SNGX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24LZ vs SNGX-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LZ vs SNGX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lz-vs-sngx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lz-vs-sngx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LZ correlations · SNGX correlations