EPAM vs LZ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) carry a correlation of 0.48, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are EPAM and LZ?
On 3 years of weekly data the EPAM/LZ correlation comes out at 0.48, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.57 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.35, and annualized covariance runs at 1160.0 %².
Within EPAM's tracked universe of 16 assets, LZ comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives EPAM the advantage: -35.0% versus -45.9%, a 10.9-point spread.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
EPAM vs LZ: side by side
| EPAM (EPAM Systems, Inc.) | LZ (LegalZoom.com, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -35.0% | -45.9% |
| 5-year return | -82.3% | -82.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 47.0% | 51.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.98 | 0.94 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -75.8% | -60.0% |
| Market cap | $5.8B | $1.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | 14.8 | 67.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | EPAM | LZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -51.0% | -51.8% |
| 2023 | -9.3% | +46.0% |
| 2024 | -21.4% | -33.5% |
| 2025 | -12.4% | +32.2% |
| 2026 | -45.0% | -39.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are EPAM and LZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between EPAM and LZ?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EPAM and LZ is 0.48 over 3 years, 0.57 over 1 year and 0.35 over 5 years.
Is LZ a good diversifier for EPAM?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?
A reading of 0.48 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/epam-vs-lz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/epam-vs-lz/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: EPAM correlations · LZ correlations
