PairBook
HomeLW › LW vs MDIA

LW vs MDIA: Correlation

How closely do Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Mediaco Holding Inc. (MDIA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-5116.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LW and MDIA?

On 3 years of weekly data the LW/MDIA correlation comes out at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.19 versus -0.30 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.21, and annualized covariance runs at -5116.5 %².

Among the 17 assets we track against LW, MDIA sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #14. The last year tells two different stories: LW led by 20.3 percentage points, -0.3% for LW against -20.6% for MDIA. Note the risk asymmetry: MDIA runs 9.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LW vs MDIA: side by side

LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.)MDIA (Mediaco Holding Inc.)
1-year return-0.3%-20.6%
5-year return-6.1%-89.6%
Volatility (ann.)43.2%389.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.44-0.94
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.1%-90.2%
Market cap$7.5B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)26.6
Dividend yield2.71%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LW 2.71% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LW -63.1% vs -90.2%Higher 5y return: LW -6.1% vs -89.6%
-59%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LW · MDIA

Year-by-year returns

YearLWMDIA
2022+42.9%-78.5%
2023+22.3%-62.6%
2024-37.0%+165.1%
2025-35.7%-49.1%
2026+34.1%+79.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LW and MDIA good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LW and MDIA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LW and MDIA is -0.30 over 3 years, 0.19 over 1 year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is MDIA a good diversifier for LW?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lw-vs-mdia.json

LW vs MDIA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30LW vs MDIA-0.30

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LW vs MDIA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lw-vs-mdia.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lw-vs-mdia/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LW correlations · MDIA correlations