PairBook
HomeAMCI › AMCI vs LW

AMCI vs LW: Correlation

How closely do AMC Robotics Corporation (AMCI) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.33, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2394.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMCI and LW?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AMCI and LW correlate at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.60) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.33). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -2394.6 %².

Among the 20 assets we track against AMCI, LW sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #18. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LW ahead by 65.9 points (-66.2% versus -0.3%). Risk is not evenly split, since AMCI carries 3.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMCI vs LW: side by side

AMCI (AMC Robotics Corporation)LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-66.2%-0.3%
5-year returnn/a-6.1%
Volatility (ann.)168.1%43.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.400.44
Max drawdown (3Y)-87.8%-63.1%
Market cap$0.1B$7.5B
P/E (trailing)26.6
Dividend yield0.00%2.71%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LW 2.71% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LW -63.1% vs -87.8%
-78%0%+83%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). AMCI · LW

Year-by-year returns

YearAMCILW
2022+42.9%
2023+22.3%
2024+6.4%-37.0%
2025-30.6%-35.7%
2026-48.8%+34.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMCI and LW good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, AMCI and LW have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMCI and LW?

The AMCI/LW correlation stands at -0.33 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.60, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LW a good diversifier for AMCI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, AMCI and LW have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

A reading of -0.33 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amci-vs-lw.json

AMCI vs LW: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33AMCI vs LW-0.33

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![AMCI vs LW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/amci-vs-lw.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amci-vs-lw/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMCI correlations · LW correlations