LSTR vs STZ: Correlation
How closely do Landstar System, Inc. (LSTR) and Constellation Brands (STZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.44, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LSTR and STZ?
Over the past 3 years, LSTR and STZ moved with a correlation of 0.44, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.50 over 1 year against 0.44 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.43, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 333.8 %².
Among the 23 assets we track against LSTR, STZ ranks #16 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LSTR ahead by 55.6 points (+39.9% versus -15.7%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LSTR vs STZ: side by side
| LSTR (Landstar System, Inc.) | STZ (Constellation Brands) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +39.9% | -15.7% |
| 5-year return | +17.0% | -31.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.2% | 26.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.83 | 0.41 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -37.5% | -51.3% |
| Market cap | $6.2B | $22.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 47.0 | 12.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 3.04% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Consumer Staples |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LSTR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -7.3% | -6.4% |
| 2023 | +21.2% | +5.8% |
| 2024 | -9.7% | -7.1% |
| 2025 | -14.4% | -36.0% |
| 2026 | +29.2% | -2.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LSTR and STZ good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.44, LSTR and STZ keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LSTR and STZ?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.44 over 3 years, with 0.50 over the last year and 0.43 over 5 years.
Is STZ a good diversifier for LSTR?
Reasonably. At 0.44, LSTR and STZ keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?
A reading of 0.44 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lstr-vs-stz.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lstr-vs-stz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LSTR correlations · STZ correlations
