PairBook
HomeLPCN › LPCN vs RH

LPCN vs RH: Correlation

How closely do Lipocine Inc. (LPCN) and RH (RH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.28, which is weak.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.28
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
1723.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LPCN and RH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LPCN and RH correlate at 0.28, weak. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.38 over 1 year against 0.28 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.23, with an annualized covariance of 1723.1 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against LPCN, RH ranks #4 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives LPCN the advantage: -25.9% versus -36.5%, a 10.6-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LPCN vs RH: side by side

LPCN (Lipocine Inc.)RH (RH)
1-year return-25.9%-36.5%
5-year return-90.3%-79.8%
Volatility (ann.)90.4%67.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.692.60
Max drawdown (3Y)-82.8%-75.2%
Market cap$2.7B
P/E (trailing)28.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RH -75.2% vs -82.8%Higher 5y return: RH -79.8% vs -90.3%
-55%0%+285%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LPCN · RH

Year-by-year returns

YearLPCNRH
2022-59.8%-50.1%
2023-58.8%+9.1%
2024+74.9%+35.0%
2025+64.5%-54.5%
2026-72.2%-19.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LPCN and RH good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.28, LPCN and RH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LPCN and RH?

The LPCN/RH correlation stands at 0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.38, 5 years: 0.23), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RH a good diversifier for LPCN?

Reasonably. At 0.28, LPCN and RH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lpcn-vs-rh.json

LPCN vs RH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.28LPCN vs RH0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LPCN vs RH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lpcn-vs-rh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lpcn-vs-rh/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LPCN correlations · RH correlations