PairBook
HomeLOOP › LOOP vs MGX

LOOP vs MGX: Correlation

Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP) and Metagenomi Therapeutics, Inc. (MGX) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.31.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.31
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
2006.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LOOP and MGX?

On 3 years of weekly data the LOOP/MGX correlation comes out at 0.31, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.38) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 2006.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, MGX places #4 of the 11 assets tracked against LOOP. The last year tells two different stories: MGX led by 28.0 percentage points, -62.9% for LOOP against -34.9% for MGX.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LOOP vs MGX: side by side

LOOP (Loop Industries, Inc.)MGX (Metagenomi Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return-62.9%-34.9%
5-year return-93.8%n/a
Volatility (ann.)73.7%86.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.961.23
Max drawdown (3Y)-87.5%-90.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LOOP -87.5% vs -90.7%
-70%0%+60%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LOOP · MGX

Year-by-year returns

YearLOOPMGX
2022-80.5%
2023+58.2%
2024-68.3%
2025-16.7%-55.1%
2026-44.3%-25.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LOOP and MGX good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.31, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LOOP and MGX?

The LOOP/MGX correlation stands at 0.31 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.38, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MGX a good diversifier for LOOP?

A fair diversifier. At 0.31, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.31 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.31 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/loop-vs-mgx.json

LOOP vs MGX: 3-year weekly correlation 0.31LOOP vs MGX0.31

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LOOP vs MGX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/loop-vs-mgx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/loop-vs-mgx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LOOP correlations · MGX correlations