PairBook
HomeLOMA › LOMA vs MDT

LOMA vs MDT: Correlation

Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) and Medtronic (MDT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-189.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LOMA and MDT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LOMA and MDT correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.24 over 1 year against -0.19 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.07, with an annualized covariance of -189.9 %².

Within LOMA's tracked universe of 16 assets, MDT comes in at #10 by 3-year correlation. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +3.0% for LOMA and +0.9% for MDT. Risk is not evenly split, since LOMA carries 2.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LOMA vs MDT: side by side

LOMA (Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima)MDT (Medtronic)
1-year return+3.0%+0.9%
5-year return+76.0%-21.4%
Volatility (ann.)47.1%21.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.640.37
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.3%-28.9%
Market cap$1.1B$115.2B
P/E (trailing)38.724.1
Dividend yield0.00%3.09%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Lower P/E: MDT 24.1 vs 38.7Higher yield: MDT 3.09% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MDT -28.9% vs -48.3%Higher 5y return: LOMA +76.0% vs -21.4%
-20%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LOMA · MDT

Year-by-year returns

YearLOMAMDT
2022+26.6%-22.6%
2023+21.0%+9.6%
2024+68.4%+0.3%
2025+8.5%+24.0%
2026-25.3%-4.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LOMA and MDT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LOMA and MDT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LOMA and MDT is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is MDT a good diversifier for LOMA?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/loma-vs-mdt.json

LOMA vs MDT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19LOMA vs MDT-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LOMA vs MDT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/loma-vs-mdt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/loma-vs-mdt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LOMA correlations · MDT correlations