FISV vs LOMA: Correlation
How closely do Fiserv (FISV) and Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.36, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FISV and LOMA?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FISV and LOMA correlate at -0.36, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.55) than the 3-year average (-0.36). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.21, with an annualized covariance of -655.7 %².
Out of 39 assets tracked against FISV, LOMA lands near the bottom at #38. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LOMA outperformed by 64.9 percentage points (-61.9% for FISV against +3.0% for LOMA).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FISV vs LOMA: side by side
| FISV (Fiserv) | LOMA (Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -61.9% | +3.0% |
| 5-year return | -55.0% | +76.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 39.2% | 47.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.58 | 0.64 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -80.2% | -48.3% |
| Market cap | $28.0B | $1.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 10.1 | 38.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Financials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FISV | LOMA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -2.6% | +26.6% |
| 2023 | +31.4% | +21.0% |
| 2024 | +54.6% | +68.4% |
| 2025 | -67.3% | +8.5% |
| 2026 | -21.7% | -25.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FISV and LOMA good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.36 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FISV and LOMA?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.36 over 3 years, with -0.55 over the last year and -0.21 over 5 years.
Is LOMA a good diversifier for FISV?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.36 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fisv-vs-loma.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fisv-vs-loma/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FISV correlations · LOMA correlations
