PairBook
HomeLOCL › LOCL vs TRMB

LOCL vs TRMB: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) and Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carry a correlation of -0.16, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.06
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-718.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LOCL and TRMB?

Over the past 3 years, LOCL and TRMB moved with a correlation of -0.16, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.06) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.16). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.02, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -718.0 %².

Within LOCL's tracked universe of 34 assets, TRMB comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TRMB outperformed by 33.7 percentage points (-58.8% for LOCL against -25.1% for TRMB). One caveat on sizing: LOCL is 4.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LOCL vs TRMB: side by side

LOCL (Local Bounti Corporation)TRMB (Trimble Inc.)
1-year return-58.8%-25.1%
5-year return-99.2%-35.7%
Volatility (ann.)142.7%30.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.491.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.4%-42.7%
Market cap$14.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Smaller drawdown: TRMB -42.7% vs -79.4%Higher 5y return: TRMB -35.7% vs -99.2%
-57%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LOCL · TRMB

Year-by-year returns

YearLOCLTRMB
2022-78.4%-42.0%
2023-88.5%+5.2%
2024+0.0%+32.8%
2025+3.4%+10.9%
2026-53.8%-21.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LOCL and TRMB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LOCL and TRMB?

The LOCL/TRMB correlation stands at -0.16 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.06, 5 years: 0.02), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TRMB a good diversifier for LOCL?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/locl-vs-trmb.json

LOCL vs TRMB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16LOCL vs TRMB-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LOCL vs TRMB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/locl-vs-trmb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/locl-vs-trmb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LOCL correlations · TRMB correlations