PairBook
HomeLOCL › LOCL vs RSF

LOCL vs RSF: Correlation

Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) and RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.28
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
212.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LOCL and RSF?

Over the past 3 years, LOCL and RSF moved with a correlation of 0.28, which is weak. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.20) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 212.8 %².

Within LOCL's tracked universe of 34 assets, RSF comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RSF outperformed by 68.9 percentage points (-58.8% for LOCL against +10.1% for RSF). One caveat on sizing: LOCL is 26.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LOCL vs RSF: side by side

LOCL (Local Bounti Corporation)RSF (RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund)
1-year return-58.8%+10.1%
5-year return-99.2%+30.6%
Volatility (ann.)142.7%5.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.490.06
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.4%-5.0%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)13.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RSF -5.0% vs -79.4%Higher 5y return: RSF +30.6% vs -99.2%
-57%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LOCL · RSF

Year-by-year returns

YearLOCLRSF
2022-78.4%-1.6%
2023-88.5%+3.8%
2024+0.0%+10.6%
2025+3.4%+4.6%
2026-53.8%+8.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LOCL and RSF good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.28, LOCL and RSF keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LOCL and RSF?

The LOCL/RSF correlation stands at 0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.20, 5 years: 0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RSF a good diversifier for LOCL?

Reasonably. At 0.28, LOCL and RSF keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/locl-vs-rsf.json

LOCL vs RSF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.28LOCL vs RSF0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LOCL vs RSF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/locl-vs-rsf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/locl-vs-rsf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LOCL correlations · RSF correlations