PairBook
HomeLOCL › LOCL vs RTX

LOCL vs RTX: Correlation

Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) and RTX Corporation (RTX) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-664.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LOCL and RTX?

Over the past 3 years, LOCL and RTX moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.09, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -664.6 %².

Among the 34 assets we track against LOCL, RTX ranks #15 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RTX led by 93.5 percentage points, -58.8% for LOCL against +34.7% for RTX. One caveat on sizing: LOCL is 5.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LOCL vs RTX: side by side

LOCL (Local Bounti Corporation)RTX (RTX Corporation)
1-year return-58.8%+34.7%
5-year return-99.2%+178.4%
Volatility (ann.)142.7%25.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.490.57
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.4%-19.7%
Market cap$285.8B
P/E (trailing)37.3
Dividend yield0.00%1.31%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: RTX 1.31% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RTX -19.7% vs -79.4%Higher 5y return: RTX +178.4% vs -99.2%
-57%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LOCL · RTX

Year-by-year returns

YearLOCLRTX
2022-78.4%+20.0%
2023-88.5%-14.4%
2024+0.0%+40.8%
2025+3.4%+61.4%
2026-53.8%+16.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LOCL and RTX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LOCL and RTX?

The LOCL/RTX correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RTX a good diversifier for LOCL?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/locl-vs-rtx.json

LOCL vs RTX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19LOCL vs RTX-0.19

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LOCL vs RTX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/locl-vs-rtx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/locl-vs-rtx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LOCL correlations · RTX correlations