PairBook
HomeLOCL › LOCL vs RNGR

LOCL vs RNGR: Correlation

Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) and Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1232.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LOCL and RNGR?

On 3 years of weekly data the LOCL/RNGR correlation comes out at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.25) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.23). The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -1232.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, RNGR places #24 of the 34 assets tracked against LOCL. The last year tells two different stories: RNGR led by 77.8 percentage points, -58.8% for LOCL against +19.0% for RNGR. Risk is not evenly split, since LOCL carries 3.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LOCL vs RNGR: side by side

LOCL (Local Bounti Corporation)RNGR (Ranger Energy Services, Inc.)
1-year return-58.8%+19.0%
5-year return-99.2%+129.0%
Volatility (ann.)142.7%37.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.490.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.4%-40.5%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)26.4
Dividend yield0.00%1.52%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RNGR 1.52% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RNGR -40.5% vs -79.4%Higher 5y return: RNGR +129.0% vs -99.2%
-57%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LOCL · RNGR

Year-by-year returns

YearLOCLRNGR
2022-78.4%+7.2%
2023-88.5%-6.3%
2024+0.0%+53.9%
2025+3.4%-7.9%
2026-53.8%+18.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LOCL and RNGR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LOCL and RNGR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with 0.25 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is RNGR a good diversifier for LOCL?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/locl-vs-rngr.json

LOCL vs RNGR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23LOCL vs RNGR-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LOCL vs RNGR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/locl-vs-rngr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/locl-vs-rngr/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LOCL correlations · RNGR correlations