PairBook
HomeLOCL › LOCL vs RLYB

LOCL vs RLYB: Correlation

How closely do Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) and Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2877.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LOCL and RLYB?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LOCL and RLYB correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.33) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.04, with an annualized covariance of -2877.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, RLYB places #19 of the 34 assets tracked against LOCL. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RLYB outperformed by 313.9 percentage points (-58.8% for LOCL against +255.1% for RLYB).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LOCL vs RLYB: side by side

LOCL (Local Bounti Corporation)RLYB (Rallybio Corporation)
1-year return-58.8%+255.1%
5-year return-99.2%-83.7%
Volatility (ann.)142.7%99.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.490.78
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.4%-95.5%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)2.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LOCL -79.4% vs -95.5%Higher 5y return: RLYB -83.7% vs -99.2%
-57%0%+249%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LOCL · RLYB

Year-by-year returns

YearLOCLRLYB
2022-78.4%-31.1%
2023-88.5%-63.6%
2024+0.0%-59.8%
2025+3.4%-28.5%
2026-53.8%+205.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LOCL and RLYB good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LOCL and RLYB?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.33 over the last year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is RLYB a good diversifier for LOCL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/locl-vs-rlyb.json

LOCL vs RLYB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20LOCL vs RLYB-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LOCL vs RLYB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/locl-vs-rlyb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/locl-vs-rlyb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LOCL correlations · RLYB correlations